This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Skin prick testing in urticaria

Authoring team

Skin prick testing (SPT)

  • allergic reactions to foods are rarely the cause of chronic urticaria but patients are often referred to hospital in the belief that foods are responsible
    • a practical approach is to start by excluding an atopic diathesis by undertaking skin prick tests (SPTs) to a panel of aeroallergens
      • if negative, this significantly reduces the likelihood of an IgE-mediated allergic reaction to foods and other allergens
  • additional skin testing can also be helpful to some of the foods that the patient suspects as the cause of their urticaria

  • the sight of a negative SPT helps to reassure the patient that allergy is not the cause of their symptoms and may contribute to improved concordance with long-term antihistamines
    • however, foods may be responsible for the symptoms of acute intermittent urticaria, for example wheat followed by exercise can cause urticaria/angio-oedema and even anaphylaxis
      • in this situation the patient is often atopic and has a positive SPT and/or specific IgE to the implicated food

Reference:


Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.