Sensitivity and specificity
These are statistical terms that are often confused. These terms can be illustrated by way of an example:
At a particular hospital a MIBG scanner is used to detect phaeochromocytomas. A positive scan was reported in 38 cases. An audit showed:
- true positive (TP) 10, true negative (TN) 25,
- false positive (FP) 0, false negative (FN) 3
where:
- patients with phaeochromocytoma TP (person with a phaeochromocytoma and positive test)
- patients with phaeochromocytoma FN (person with a phaeochromocytoma and negative test)
- patients without phaeochromocytoma FP (person without a phaeochromocytoma with a positive test)
- patients without a phaeochromocytoma TN (person without a phaeochromoytoma with a negative test)
phaeochromocytoma present | phaeochromyctoma absent |
test result positive TP = 10 | test result positive FP = 0 |
test result negative FN = 3 | test result negative TN = 25 |
- sensitivity = 100xTP /(TP+FN) = 100 x 10(10 + 3) = 77%
- i.e. proportion of people with a phaeochromocytoma who are corectly identified by the screening test = 77%
- i.e. proportion of people with a phaeochromocytoma who are corectly identified by the screening test = 77%
- specificity = 100xTN /(TN+FP) = 100 x 25 /(25+0) = 100%
- i.e. proportion of people without phaeochromocytoma who have had a negative test result = 100%
- i.e. proportion of people without phaeochromocytoma who have had a negative test result = 100%
- positive predictive value = 100xTP/(TP+FP) = 100 x 10/(10+0) = 100%
i.e. the proportion of screening tests that are correct.
Related pages
Create an account to add page annotations
Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.