This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Interpretation of results

Authoring team

  • a patient with normal hearing in both ears perceives the sound in the midline.
  • a patient with unilateral conductive loss perceives the sound in the ear with the conductive loss i.e. if the right has a conductive loss, the sound lateralises to the right ear.
  • a patient with unilateral sensorineural loss perceives the sound in the ear with the better cochlear i.e. if the right ear has a sensorineural loss, the sound lateralises to the left ear.
  • a patient with a very severe unilateral loss on the right i.e. a dead ear may produce the following results:
    • Rinne -ve in right ear
    • Weber lateralising to the left ear
  • in this case, Rinne's result is a false negative. On testing the right ear, the bone conduction is heard in the normal left cochlear by skull crossover.
  • the Weber's test is more sensitive than the Rinne's test.

Note:

  • studies the Weber test has shown low sensitivity and modest specificity
  • when there is suspicion of hearing loss, audiometry should be performed even if bedside tests are normal (1)

References:


Related pages

Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.