This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF)

Authoring team

Screening for atrial fibrillation

  • the 2019 UK National Screening Committee posed a series of criteria that would need to be established to justify screening and then, after performing an exhaustive evidence review around each criterion, concluded that many factors remain "uncertain" so that screening is not recommended at this time

  • the United States Preventive Services Task Force has concluded that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for atrial fibrillation with electrocardiography

At present, although screening can detect asymptomatic atrial fibrillation, the downstream benefit of widespread implementation of screening in unselected populations is unproven (1)

Reference:

  • Ponamgi SP et al. Screening and management of atrial fibrillation in primary care. BMJ 2021;372:mn379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.mn379
  • King S, Fitzgerald A, Bartlett C, et al. The UK NSC recommendation on Atrial Fibrillation screening in adults. 2019. https://legacyscreening.phe.org.uk/atrialfibrillation


Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.