This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Low-dose triple-pill vs standard-care protocols for hypertension treatment in Nigeria

Authoring team

In a randomized trial in Nigeria among 300 Black African patients with uncontrolled hypertension who were either untreated or receiving a single blood pressure–lowering drug, treatment with low-dose triple-pill protocol, compared with standard-care protocol, for 6 months significantly reduced home systolic blood pressure (by 5.8 mm Hg), with no increase in discontinuation of trial treatment due to adverse events:

  • participants were randomly allocated to low-dose triple-pill or standard-care protocols.
    • triple-pill protocol involved a novel combination of telmisartan, amlodipine, and indapamide in triple one-quarter, one-half, and standard doses (ie, 10/1.25/0.625 mg, 20/2.5/1.25 mg, and 40/5/2.5 mg), with accelerated up-titration
    • standard-care protocol was the Nigeria hypertension treatment protocol starting with amlodipine (5 mg)
  • Main outcomes and measures
    • primary effectiveness outcome was the reduction in home mean systolic blood pressure, and the primary safety outcome was discontinuation of trial treatment due to adverse events, both from randomization to month 6
  • Results
    • at month 6, clinic blood pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg) was 82% vs 72% (risk difference, 10% [95% CI, −2% to 20%]) and home blood pressure control (<130/80 mm Hg) was 62% vs 28% (risk difference, 33% [95% CI, 22% to 44%]) in the triple-pill compared with the standard-care protocol group; these were 2 of 21 prespecified secondary effectiveness end points. No participants discontinued trial treatment due to adverse events

Conclusion:

  • compared with standard-care protocol, treatment with a low-dose triple-pill protocol can improve blood pressure lowering

Reference:

  1. Dike B et al. Low-Dose Triple-Pill vs Standard-Care Protocols for Hypertension Treatment in Nigeria - A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2024;332(13):1070-1079. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.18080

Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.