This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Tuning fork tests

Last reviewed dd mmm yyyy. Last edited dd mmm yyyy

Authoring team

Tuning fork tests

  • these allow one to distinguish between conductive and sensorineural deafness.
  • one should use a 512Hz tuning fork with a flattened base.
  • the tuning fork should be struck against one's elbow or knee, and not against a bedside table or desk as this produces undesirable harmonics.
  • the tuning fork is first held with its acoustic axis in line with the external auditory meatus - the sound being heard via the process of air conduction. If the tuning fork is pressed firmly against the skull the note is transmitted directly to the cochlea by the process of bone conduction.
  • commonly used bedside tuning folk tests are: (1)
    • Rinne test
    • Weber test
  • other tuning fork tests include:(1)
    • Bing test
    • Schwabach test

Note:

  • bedside tests are unreliable screening tools for detection of hearing loss (2,3)
  • Rinne and Weber tests do not reliably predict the presence and type of hearing loss (2)
  • when there is suspicion of hearing loss, audiometry should be performed even if bedside tests are normal.(2)

Reference:


Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.